• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3


  • Subject: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:40:01 -0700


On Apr 16, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Jack Repenning wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote:
That's not a reasonable answer. A glorified text editor should not require a gigabyte of ram. As computers have gotten faster, computer programs have required more ram and faster processors. The source code is no more difficult to edit than it was a decade ago. Writing text should be a solved problem.

If all you're doing is writing text, Xcode is not the right tool. There's quite a great deal of "glory" in there to justify the increased resource usage. Whether there's *enough* glory to justify *this* *much* resource usage as a more complicated conversation.

Writing text is its main function. If it can't do that well, it doesn't matter what else it can do.


If nothing else, look at it this way: I remember a time when Emacs was considered such a big program people actually got fired for launching it on a shared machine, and people said *that* "glorified text editor" was unjustifiably big. Now, with Xcode around to compare to, Emacs is positively puny!


I stopped using emacs for the much the same reason as I avoid Xcode: it's too slow. It takes an unreasonably long time to open and when I want to start editing text, I want to do it _right now_.

The scope of emacs is much larger than that of Xcode so I'm not sure I'd call it puny. The impression I got from listening to Stallman give a talk last year (here's 9 minutes of it, apparently <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnWeWAeD1zY >) was that he uses emacs for everything. The old joke about a great OS but coming with a poor text editor, indeed! I'm just thankful that Apple doesn't think that I should be checking my email with Xcode.

--
Steve Checkoway





_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: P Teeson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: William Bates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: "Wesley Smith" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: "Adam R. Maxwell" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Joachim Deelen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Jeremy Pereira <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Jack Repenning <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Next by Date: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Previous by thread: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Next by thread: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread