• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?


  • Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • From: Paul Russell <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:21:37 +0100

On 8 Aug 2008, at 14:13, Andy O'Meara wrote:


Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but I was wondering why the default gcc version in Xcode 3.1 is 4.0 (and not 4.2). Our products are highly CPU intensive, so we're always interested in better code generation but the fact that 4.2 isn't the default makes me nervous. Is there some implied liability that I'm not picking up on? Perhaps some gcc gurus here can offer some insight or advice here... Thanks in advance.



If you want better code generation then try using the Intel ICC compiler rather than Apple's gcc.


Paul

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
      • From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >gcc 4.2 not the default? (From: Andy O'Meara <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Next by Date: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Previous by thread: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Next by thread: Re: gcc 4.2 not the default?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread