• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: (no subject)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (no subject)


  • Subject: Re: (no subject)
  • From: Bryan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 22:14:16 -0500
  • Organization: Apex Radiology

Actually, it is not by choice that the comma is entered instead of the
option-L.
It is automatically changed by either Netscape or the list server.
The same thing has happend to me. Here I'll show you:
I'm typing an option-L here => ,


Paul Berkowitz wrote:

> On 11/26/00 2:09 PM, "Hellum Timothy" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> > That script submitted by Mark looked interesting, but when I copy-pasted
> > it into SE, I got an error at the comma in the following line:
> > <snip>
> >
> > end repeat
> > display dialog "The binary representation of \"" & theText & , (<--
> > right here)
> > "\" is \"" & binString & "\""
> > end if
> >
> > <end snip>
> >
> > Why would that happen?
> >
>
> For some reason, some people have started to post scripts here using commas
> to represent the continuation character (made by option-L), which gets
> mangled by server, as does SE's soft-wrapping if you simply leave it out.
>
> Please - would anyone doing so - or using any other "homemade"
> representation - please _say so_? You can hardly expect others to
> understand.
>
> (I suppose it's futile to expect that in the year 2010, the last diehards
> will have finally given up Emailer, and everyone will have fast-speed
> internet, so we can finally either allow HTML or everyone will also have
> format=flowed email option, and soft-wrapping can be effected in email by
> everyone. On mailing lists where everyone has one or the other of these,
> scripts come over so much better and more easily. Never mind, please don't
> start flaming. I'll drop it.)
>
> --
> Paul Berkowitz


References: 
 >Re: (no subject) (From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: (no subject)
  • Next by Date: Re: (no subject)
  • Previous by thread: Re: (no subject)
  • Next by thread: Re: (no subject)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread