Re: [meta-T] Tiny HTML question
Re: [meta-T] Tiny HTML question
- Subject: Re: [meta-T] Tiny HTML question
- From: Helmut Fuchs <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:05:44 +0100
At 13:35 Uhr -0800 20.12.2001, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
Ummm..., are you softening us up for the change, Chuq?
Arrrrgh. I hope not.
Maybe I'm just completely ignorant of the problems involved, and
maybe the question has already been raised - but why shouldn't it be
possible to use the Content-type header?
My incoming list-mail reads:
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Is it impossible to simply recode incoming messages to ISO Latin 1
and simply change the header accordingly? Most eMailers can deal with
the following:
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Why choose an easy solution if we can make all our lives even more
complicated with writing HTML eMails (which then will be
extra-mangled by the list-server I guess)?
Puzzled,
Helmut