Re: Facespan 3.5.1
Re: Facespan 3.5.1
- Subject: Re: Facespan 3.5.1
- From: "Randy Fingeroot" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:51:02 -0500
I have it on fairly good authority that the version of Facespan for OSX will
work on 9.1. Don't know if it will go below that, though.
--
Randy Fingeroot
Pre-Press Supervisor
Tallahassee Democrat
(850) 599-2141
(850) 599-2295 (fax)
>
From: Phi Sanders <email@hidden>
>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:49:38 -0500
>
To: AS Users <email@hidden>
>
Subject: Re: Facespan 3.5.1
>
>
On 2/22/01, cris {email@hidden} said the following :
>
>
> I agree that it makes probably not much sense to put more work into the
>
> classic version. DTI is surely very very small, so they have to focus on
>
> something. Let's hope on the X version.
>
>
I agree, as long as the OS X version can generate apps that will run
>
on Classic Mac OS. If not, it's going to fairly useless for a good while.
>
>
Do they think people are going to upgrade all of their production machines
>
en masse to be able to use FaceSpan ?? Not going to happen. People will
>
chose to stick with their current version of FaceSpan and DTI will suffer
>
a lack of upgrade sales... which could mean they never get around to fixing
>
the bugs and adding much-needed features (like >32K scripts & stability)
>
>
~Phi
>
--
>
Phi Sanders
>
>
"And now, back to your regularly scheduled reality."
>
_______________________________________________
>
applescript-users mailing list
>
email@hidden
>
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users