• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Facespan 3.5.1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Facespan 3.5.1


  • Subject: Re: Facespan 3.5.1
  • From: Phi Sanders <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:49:38 -0500

On 2/22/01, cris {email@hidden} said the following :

>I agree that it makes probably not much sense to put more work into the
>classic version. DTI is surely very very small, so they have to focus on
>something. Let's hope on the X version.

I agree, as long as the OS X version can generate apps that will run
on Classic Mac OS. If not, it's going to fairly useless for a good while.

Do they think people are going to upgrade all of their production machines
en masse to be able to use FaceSpan ?? Not going to happen. People will
chose to stick with their current version of FaceSpan and DTI will suffer
a lack of upgrade sales... which could mean they never get around to fixing
the bugs and adding much-needed features (like >32K scripts & stability)

~Phi
--
Phi Sanders

"And now, back to your regularly scheduled reality."


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Facespan 3.5.1
      • From: "Randy Fingeroot" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you? (From: cris <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Scheduling Tasks With Applescript
  • Next by Date: Re: Michelle - Embedding a sound
  • Previous by thread: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
  • Next by thread: Re: Facespan 3.5.1
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread