• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Facespan versus Smile
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Facespan versus Smile


  • Subject: Re: Facespan versus Smile
  • From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 23:26:38 -0500

At 20:52 -0500 21/02/01, Phi Sanders wrote:
>
>I once heard a rumor of this feature (probably on this list), and tried Smile
>(1.5 I think it was) but found that it seemed you could present customized
>dialogs from Smile, but not much else... FaceSpan & RealBasic allow you to
>create "stand-alone" applications, with GUIs as complex and diverse as
>"real" applications... If Smile can indeed do this, then it's not documented
>properly, and when corrected should make Smile the hands-down first choice
>script editor!!

It can (that's what we do for a living) ... but it's a lot of work: in fact
you'd have to customize a copy of Smile itself. I would not recommend it
(yet).

>I'm now looking at getting ScriptBase or Valentina, does Smile replace
>them as well?

I don't know either product - other might provide a more relevant reply.

I would bet that Smile would replace elegantly ScriptBase, and that it
would provide a cool interface to Valentina.

Emmanuel

PS
Smile has gone a long way since 1.5. You might want to give a try to the
latest version.


References: 
 >Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad? (From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>)
 >Facespan versus Smile (From: Phi Sanders <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: magic integer converter number 62? - Joking???
  • Next by Date: Re: magic integer converter number 62? - Joking???
  • Previous by thread: Facespan versus Smile
  • Next by thread: Re: Facespan versus Smile
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread