• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hash arrays and other mysteries


  • Subject: Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
  • From: John W Baxter <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:56:46 -0700

At 16:23 +0100 10/19/2001, has wrote:
>I can understand that compiling a string as executable code takes a certain
>amount of time, and that doing this during runtime has implications for the
>"parent" script's speed. Except Smile's "do script" does the same thing,
>but in a fraction of the time. I don't understand why. Maybe Smile has its
>own built-in compiler that happens to be faster than Applescript's own? Or
>some other reason?

I believe that, outside Style, there is a Component load needed. Style
likely keeps the Component loaded while it's running, since it's likely to
be asked to compile pretty much any time.

--John

--
John Baxter email@hidden Port Ludlow, WA, USA


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
      • From: John W Baxter <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: hash arrays and other mysteries (From: has <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Converting an applescript from 68k app to PPC
  • Next by Date: Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
  • Previous by thread: Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
  • Next by thread: Re: hash arrays and other mysteries
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread