• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Running scripts over network
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Running scripts over network


  • Subject: Re: Running scripts over network
  • From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:51:42 -0400

On 08/17/2002 14:37, "Bill Briggs" <email@hidden> wrote:

> At 1:57 PM -0400 17/08/02, Dave DeLong wrote:
>> Non-TCP/IP networks (such as AppleTalk) are way cool because you
>> don't have to screw around with the whole IP address thing and stuff.
>
> And they are way limited because you can't reach past your local
> LAN/WAN that supports AppleTalk.

And Zeroconf will do the same for IP.

>
>
>
>> I frequently attend my local MUG where they are forever trying to
>> access the internet on the TCP/IP network in the building, but can
>> NEVER do it.
>
> This sounds silly. The internet runs on IP protocols (TCP, UDP,
> etc.). If they can't access the internet then they don't know how to
> set up a Mac for the internet (drop dead easy), or they are kept off
> by a firewall that has all the relevant ports blocked.

Or, the people running the building's network have decided, quite sensibly,
to not allow random machines on their network. Bandwidth use costs $$$ you
know. Have you talked to the IT people about this yet?

>
>
>
>> So, based on my experiances, TCP/IP is just a really complicated way
>> of networking that doesn't seem to work too well.
>
> On the contrary, it works brilliantly. The entire net runs on it.
> Given the scale of the infrastructure and the level of usage, it's
> nothing short of remarkable that it all works so well.

IP is quite simple, in some ways too simple. It doesn't have the services
that you are used to with Appletalk, which is why it's harder to configure
sometimes. But it scales really well, (to interplanetary levels in
fact...there have been IP networks set up between here and Mars.), and is
able to handle a lot of different uses.

>
>
>
>> AppleTalk, on the other hand, has never given me any problems at all
>> and is very stable. So, AppleTalk is way cool.
>
> AppleTalk is only good for you to talk to other Macs (or PCMacLan
> equipped PCs) on your network. Stability isn't an issue. Connectivity
> is.

All protocols are stable. The only thing that makes a network protocol
unstable is the hardware.

> The main point to take away is that the physical connection -
> ethernet, wireless, whatever - has nothing to do with the protocols
> that are carried on it. Networks carry data using multiple protocols,
> whether you are aware of it or not. To say that AppleTalk is way cool
> and TCP/IP is flaky is to simply misunderstand nearly everything
> about the network we are all using.
>

Yep. And don't assume that just because you can't connect from a building,
that there's 'something wrong'. In fact, that means there's 'something
right', as the security setup is preventing unauthorized hosts from eating
bandwidth.

john

--
"Keecking butt fahr gudness"
Baldur's Gate
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Running scripts over network (From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Running scripts over network
  • Next by Date: Attach a folder item...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Running scripts over network
  • Next by thread: Re: Running scripts over network
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread