• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts


  • Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • From: "Neal A. Crocker" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:51:55 -0800

Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:02:19 -0800
To: email@hidden
From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts

At 10:22 PM -0500 1/28/02, email@hidden wrote:
> 1. Put the 'Foobar Addition' in the Scripting Additions folder
> 2. Put the 'Foobar Terminology' anywhere you want.
> 3. To use the handlers in the scripting addition, write,
>
> using terms from application "Foobar Terminology"
> foobar
> end using terms

Now you don't get notified of terminology conflicts?

What conflicts? If the osax which is put in the Scripting Additions folder contains no aete, it supplies no terminology to conflict with anything. If all the terminology necessary for compiling against it is put in some other folder an invoked with the "using terms from" block, that terminology only has effect inside the block. If all osaxen are similary factored, as suggested, into separate loadable code and terminology files, the only global terminology left to conflict with is Applescript's, which osaxen developers should stay away from anyway.

Neal.


  • Prev by Date: Fwd: Re: Scripting Additions: Embracing the Horror of Unix
  • Next by Date: Re: ACGI form parsing in OSX?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Export to PDF from Quark in OS 9
  • Next by thread: Re: Scripting OS X Mail app
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread