Re: styled text
Re: styled text
- Subject: Re: styled text
- From: ehsan saffari <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:47:43 -0600
On 20/01/2002 14:42, Christopher Nebel, email@hidden wrote:
>
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 11:12 PM, ehsan saffari wrote:
>
>
> but then there is a catch. AS 1.3.7 has these style runs defined:
>
> plain/bold/italic/outline/shadow/underline/superscript/subscript/strikethro
>
> ugh/small caps/all caps/all lowercase/condensed/expanded/hidden
>
>
>
> but these styles seem to be inaccessible (why?):
>
> superscript/subscript/strikethrough/small caps/all caps/all
>
> lowercase/hidden
>
>
Because the "styled text" type can't represent them. They were defined
>
for the benefit of word processors.
Thanks, that is clear as mud. Are the unrepresentable styles just place
holders? Can an osax make them possible?
If underline is possible, strikethrough shouldn't be that far behind...
cheers
ehsan