• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts


  • Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:00:05 -0800

On 1/25/02 11:01 AM, "email@hidden" <email@hidden> wrote:

> But now, wrap this in a
>
> tell application "osax-terminology"
>
> end tell
>
> block, or a "using terms from" block, and you can use the terminology that
> replaces the raw codes.
>
> (On further thought, I think it would be best to use 'using terms from' and
> not
> 'tell', because the Apple event has to be sent to the script's own process,
> and
> not to the process created by running "osax-terminology" . In the second
> case,
> you'd be switching processes, and then the "osax-terminology" process would
> call
> the "osax-code" scripting addition. You might as well just make it a Faceless
> Background Application then.)

But a 'using terms from' block always has to surround a 'tell app' block. it
doesn't exist on its own. Either way you'd need an app, and a 'tell app'
block, no?

--
Paul Berkowitz


References: 
 >Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: newbie ? re: Applescripting for MS Entourage
  • Next by Date: Re: Weird try block syntax
  • Previous by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • Next by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread