Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts [goi
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts [goi
- Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts [goi
- From: email@hidden (Michael Sullivan)
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:21:53 -0500
- Organization: Society for the Incurably Pompous
>
At 11:20 -0500 28/01/02, Arthur J Knapp wrote:
>
>
> While I agree with these sentiments, it should also be pointed out
>
>that AppleScript is supposed to be the programming language for the
>
>"rest of us", (or whatever that expression is). It often seems like
>
>a beginning AppleScripter has to work harder than a beginning C
>
>programmer, precisely because there are so few libraries or complete
>
>scripts to make immediate use of.
>
'We' are definitely trying to change this state of thing. Stay tuned.
Who is "we" and what are you doing? You can't just leave us in suspense
like that?
I've certainly noticed extensive contributions from you on MacScripter
and Applemods, which is about the extent of what I figure an individual
scripter can easily do to support the effort toward more modular support
in AS.
But this seems to imply much more...
Michael
--
Michael Sullivan
Business Card Express of CT Thermographers to the Trade
Cheshire, CT email@hidden