Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
- Subject: Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
- From: Philip Aker <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 08:08:24 -0700
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 07:29 AM, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
On 6/16/02 2:43 AM, "Richard Morton" <email@hidden> wrote:
Just a hunch - do you have Smile/Satimage installed? I had
this happen
to me under OS 9 because of the osax, IIRC.
Yes indeed. Excellent hunch.
The Satimage osax has a term
path to application
which is evidently taking precedence when
path to (application support)
is not parenthesized. A namespace conflict in OS X already! That would
explain why Philip didn't need to do this whereas John and I do
need to do
so. And of course, so may anybody's users, even if a script
author does not
have Satimage installed and does not no anything about this conflict.
Lucky me. I temporarily took out Satimage last week to make sure
the embedded scripts I use in a plugin distribution only require
plain vanilla.
Good sleuthing guys!
Philip Aker
http://www.aker.ca
'
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.