• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?


  • Subject: Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
  • From: Malcolm Fitzgerald <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:28:53 +1000

On Monday, June 17, 2002, at 04:59 PM, Paul Berkowitz wrote:

Thanks for the information, Chris. The reason why I wondered if "C Header
Source File" might be some sort of default for "no file type" documents is
because both of the following types of files appear on my computer as that
type of file, with a large "h" icon or sometimes totally blank:

1) Tab-delimited text files generated by Palm Desktop 4.0 for OS X. No
extension and, I think, no file type.

The Palm Desktop exported text files are type "TEXT". On Mac OS X, if you have Project Builder installed, text files without any extension are mapped to Project Builder, and apparently PB's default description for files without extensions is "C Header Source File".

I'm not sure whether this is because Project Builder is claiming to be the default editor for "TEXT" files, or whether Launch Services (the OS facility that maps types and extensions to applications) is simply buggy. It might also simply be that there are multiple applications claiming "TEXT" files, and PB wins because it was installed last.


It's because the definition of useful applications under UNIX is not msword/msexcel/msppoint. (though you could replace item 1 with simpleText or bbedit+QXP and item 3 with butchers paper or transparency film for my personal list of useful.)

Unix is still a place where people who are interested in the physics of clockspeed work. "The rest of us" as defined by Apple for the years 1984-2001 are no longer a going concern. The "market" speaks BASIC, if not C.

For example, If you having pressing commitments, e.g., you're concerned that the USA is now a global suzerain with a shoot first and ask questions later attitude (and live in a gung-ho satellite state, like Australia) but don't know how to operate a UNIX BSD OS. Then you should ask a younger relative (daughter, niece, son, nephew) to pass on a Win98 or Mac System 6-7 machine. This was the time when OS developers expected the "user" to be productive, useful people who weren't interested in computers. I'd like system 6 interface to the new UNIX kernel but I don't think I'll be getting it (journalists tell me no-one reads this far into a piece, I can say what I like and no-one will read it ;-)
--
Malcolm Fitzgerald
Database Manager
The Australian Society of Authors

phone: 02 9318 0877 fax: 02 9318 0530
http://www.asauthors.org mailto:email@hidden
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
      • From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>
    • Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
      • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: BUG: Where's Application Support? (From: Chris Page <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Getting a text selection from a Mozilla 1.0 window
  • Next by Date: Re: Breaking the 32k limit [Was: Insufficient memory for Folder Actions Extension; how can I increase allocation?]
  • Previous by thread: Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
  • Next by thread: Re: BUG: Where's Application Support?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread