• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)


  • Subject: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • From: Olivier Destrebecq <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:19:15 -0600

I agree with Chris that we need to be careful about when we send file to other file system. But i would say that i prefer the way OS9 approached it with file exchange. What would be nice is that the finder would be aware of all that and would append those extension whenever a file is moved from a HFS+ volume to a non HFS+ volume and that application that move file do the same thing, so that the user don't have to get caught in the middle of that.

my opinion, olivier
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 12:52 AM, Christopher Nebel wrote:

On Saturday, March 23, 2002, at 03:45 PM, JollyRoger wrote:

On 3/23/2002 4:57 PM, "John W Baxter" <email@hidden> wrote:

Mac OS X Finder has to contend with the fact that there is no file system file ID number on a UFS-formatted disk.

Sorry, but this irritates me to no end! Just how many of us are using Mac OS X on UFS volumes? My guess would be a mere handful out of every Mac user on the planet. ... Yet we have to be careful because that one person in wherever might be using UFS. ...let's just get rid of these nasty file ID's so we don't hurt the poor handful of hurt UFS users feelings.

Unfortunately, it's not that simple. It's not just UFS that doesn't support file IDs, it's every file system Mac OS X supports *except* HFS, HFS+, and AFP (AppleShare). That means NFS, SMB, WebDAV, UDF, ISO 9660, and so on. So in fact, most Mac OS X users are regularly exposed to file systems that don't support file IDs, not to mention a bunch of other spiffy HFS+ features.

The name of the game here is interoperability: you want your files to remain intact no matter where you move them, whether it's from one folder to another on your own disk or up to some departmental Linux file server. While a lowest-common-denominator solution has obvious down-sides, it has the advantage of complete fidelity.


--Chris Nebel
AppleScript Engineering
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity
      • From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id) (From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Bugging ya'll again...
  • Next by Date: Re: 2nd attempt: copying and pasting
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity (was Re: Finding folder from its id)
  • Next by thread: Re: [OFF] NeXT stupidity
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread