• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal


  • Subject: Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal
  • From: Jeffrey Berman <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:36:30 -0500

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Helmut Fuchs <email@hidden> wrote:

>> Jeffrey, I guess using AppleScript is the wrong approach here. There
> are better, more transparent and more reliable ways to keep ssh
> sessions alive.
>
> In the configuration of my shell CTRL-T maps to "transpose
> characters" - this may differ for different shells and may be
> annoying, if the cursor is in the middle of a line.

Helmut:

My SSH connection is to a machine running VMS, where the response to
Control-T is to issue a process status line without altering text on the
current command line. However, because the "do script" command in Terminal
adds a line feed, any text on the command line is also transmitted.

> For now you could try to add "-o KeepAlive=yes" to your invocation of
> ssh - which should work in most cases.

Ah, this would be a far more elegant solution. I have been trying to solve
the problem in AppleScript because I know little of UNIX. I checked the man
pages on my machine for SSH and found a reference to the -o switch but I
could not find any material on the "KeepAlive" option. Do you know where
this option might be explained either in the man pages or from a URL on the
Internet?


> And if you are not opening the ssh-session yourself, you could write
> a shell script that outputs anything (maybe the BEL) to STDERR in
> defined intervals, and run it in the background of your session.

Unfortunately, this suggestion is well beyond my limited UNIX knowledge.


> If none of the above works for you, I guess the best solution would
> be to ask on an ssh-mailing-list on the best way to keep a
> ssh-session alive.

If I knew enough about UNIX to ask the question, I would. In any case,
thanks for taking the time to respond. I'll give the "Keep Alive" option a
try and see if anyone can figure out a way to suppress the line feed of the
"do script" command.

-Jeffrey Berman
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Dictionary possibilities [Re: Interesting... AppleScript X??]
  • Next by Date: Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal
  • Previous by thread: Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal
  • Next by thread: Re: Sending Control-T to Terminal
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread