• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Quark conflicting properties
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quark conflicting properties


  • Subject: Re: Quark conflicting properties
  • From: Bill Metzinger <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:20:21 -0500

On Dec 14, 2003, at 11:50 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:

the bounds values for an image vary depend on the resolution, and it's not a straight-forward ratio.

I have found that it is.

Take an image I have here, 325 pixels by 500 pixels, saved at both 72dpi and 200dpi. In the first case, bounds returns {0, 0, 325, 500}. Ignore for the moment that Quark won't tell me what the resolution is to do the calculations of which you speak, and explain why the 200dpi image returns bounds of {0, 0, 108, 166}. What do these numbers actually reflect?

Hmmm. You always have to break the rules.

The file format of the picture affects the math, so does your version of Quark.
For my tests, Quark's measurements are set to points and the res of the doc is 72.

In version 4 the bounds of image 1 for eps and pict are based on 72
In version 4 the bounds of image 1 for jpg and tiff are based on 75
In version 6 the bounds of image 1 for all 4 of those formats are based on 72

The pixel dimensions of my 300dpi test image is {0,0,2160,1439}
eps and pict return {0,0,518,345}
jpg and tiff return {0,0,540,360} in QX4
jpg and tiff return {0,0,518,345} in QX6

300/75 = 4 = 2160/540
300/72 = 4.167 = 2160/518



} He is not pining, he's passed on...
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Quark conflicting properties
      • From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Quark conflicting properties (From: Bill Metzinger <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: *****SPAM***** Re: Errors on Apple Applescript website
  • Next by Date: Re: Ownership and permissions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Quark conflicting properties
  • Next by thread: Re: Quark conflicting properties
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread