Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
- Subject: Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
- From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:16:48 -0800
At 12:35p +0000 12/17/2003, Nigel Garvey didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
Gary Lists wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:59:48 -0500:
>What are your general thoughts on confirming email with iLesa and services
>like 0spam.com?
>
>Should we want to verify? Should we just ignore these messages?
Filter them out or bounce them. Verification is a waste of everyone's
time and senders can end up registering themselves all over the place
with people claiming to be someone else's anti-spam service. It's so
obviously a bad idea it makes me suspicious.
Or to put it more simply: It doesn't scale. :)
(I read somewhere scalability's a criterion the IETF uses to judge
submissions.)
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.