• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.


  • Subject: Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:59:39 +0000

I've been bouncing them back myself and guess what?
They bounce back saying their mailbox is full!!!

Obviously, a lot of people have already bounced them back to the anti-spam service.

DP

Gary Lists wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:59:48 -0500:

What are your general thoughts on confirming email with iLesa and services
like 0spam.com?

Should we want to verify? Should we just ignore these messages?

Filter them out or bounce them. Verification is a waste of everyone's
time and senders can end up registering themselves all over the place
with people claiming to be someone else's anti-spam service. It's so
obviously a bad idea it makes me suspicious.

NG
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
      • From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
    • Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
      • From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com. (From: Nigel Garvey <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Sorting IP addresses
  • Next by Date: Re: Sorting IP addresses
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
  • Next by thread: Re: [OT] Verification required for ... protected by 0Spam.com.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread