Re: percentages (was re: repeat with i in string optimization)
Re: percentages (was re: repeat with i in string optimization)
- Subject: Re: percentages (was re: repeat with i in string optimization)
- From: Charles Arthur <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:24:15 +0000
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:53:38 -0800, Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden> wrote
..
>
That should have read:
>
>
This is also much faster, sometimes 100 times faster.*
>
>
* (that's 10,000 %).
No.
100% faster = 2x faster.
200% faster = 3x faster.
300% faster = 4x faster.
400% faster = 5x faster.
500% faster = 6x faster.
600% faster = 7x faster.
700% faster = 8x faster.
800% faster = 9x faster.
Which leads us therefore to conclude that 900% = 10x faster.
So 100x faster would be 9,000% faster. But this sounds like 9x to the
untrained ear.
The lesson: do not use percentages greater than 100%. They are always
confusing.
Charles
----------------------------
http://www.ukclimbing.com : 1100+ British crags, 350+ British climbing
walls - searchable by distance and anything else you care to think of -
with weather forecasts for every one, plus maps, articles, news and
features. And there's even a cool shop attached.
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.