Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
- Subject: Re: Why is AS so poorly documented?
- From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:00:32 -0600
FWIW, It's worth a lot and I shall be using it. Thank you.
I have also remove the space that showed up in the URL below and it should work in spite of email censoring of long lines.
At 16:28 +1000 7/24/03, Richard Morton wrote:
>
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 11:14 AM, Dave Balderstone wrote:
>
>
>On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 12:39 PM, Doug McNutt wrote:
>
>
>
>>What would really be nice is if HTML, or equivalent, anchors were used in dictionaries.
>
>
>
>That would indeed be a good thing...
>
>
FWIW, All the AS dictionaries I've put up on The FooDoo Lounge have anchors to terms defined elsewhere in the dict:
>
>
<http://home.netc.net.au/~sunreal/FooDooLounge/info/dictionaries/index.html>
--
--> There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't <--
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.