Re: Why so few OSX Additions?
Re: Why so few OSX Additions?
- Subject: Re: Why so few OSX Additions?
- From: Jean-Baptiste LE STANG <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:48:12 +0200
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:32:29 +0200
To: email@hidden
From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Why so few OSX Additions?
At 8:39 PM -0700 20/06/03, Jon Pugh wrote:
At 5:31 PM -0400 6/20/03, Xandra Lee wrote:
Now, with OSX reaching toddler stage (2 years?) I somewhat surprised
by the
lack "standard" 3rd party additions. Tanaka, Akua, (and a gazillion
other
little wonders) seem to be MIA. Gratefully Jon and Emmanuel and a few
newbies have stepped up to the plate, but the pickin's are few (as
evidenced
by the list on MacScripter.
Does anyone know why? Are they working on these? -- or have they
thrown in
the towel?
The simple fact is that with Unix built in, the "do shell script"
osax can serve as a "do anything" osax. The only thing necessary to
transfer is the knowledge of the string to feed it to accomplish the
most simple or arcane of tasks without waiting for someone to write
some new scripting addition, and it will work on everyone's system,
which is often the bane of the scripting addition writer. How many
times have you heard on this very list, "I'd like a built-in
solution, not some extra third party thing."
Of course I'm seconding Jon, "do shell script" had killed most needs
for an osax (and that's a good thing).
What may not be clear to everyone is, you can't conveniently use "do
shell script" if you expect possibly big pieces of data (> 64 KB).
That's a pity.
Emmanuel
It's rather time consuming to write a good OSAX no?
JB
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.