• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Selection (was Re: Better Open Dictionary)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Selection (was Re: Better Open Dictionary)


  • Subject: Re: Selection (was Re: Better Open Dictionary)
  • From: has <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:37:10 +0000

John Delacour wrote:


>Like I said, Script Editor's selection-object class is not part of
the Standard Suite.

Then all I can say is that it has no place anywhere else and that
they've got it wrong!

SE's selection-object class isn't listed in the Standard Suite because it isn't from the Standard Suite. It's something the SE engineers have implemented for themselves, on account of the Standard Suite not providing a selection-object class of its own. Having to kludge around a system-level shortcoming at the application level like this is hardly the ideal solution, but until the Cocoa frameworks catch up then it's either that or nothing at all.


There's nothing in the rules that say all applications MUST implement a particular class in a particular way. Good designers do it because interface consistency across applications is (was?) the Macintosh Way. Thus every Mac application standardised on Cmd-X|C|V shortcuts for for cut-n-paste right from Day One - and users were happy - while Windows spent years honking off folk who couldn't remember if a particular app used F1 or ctrl-C or some other weird combo. Consistent UI is nice to have, but it's not the end of the world if you don't. (As MS have amply demonstrated.)

It's depressing that cross-application UI consistency has gone to the wall in recent years. But as long as the non-standard behaviour is documented, it's hardly a deal-stopper that REAL bugs are. And there's _plenty_ of those you could be railing at. I appreciate you're trying to make constructive criticism here, but there's only so much useful comment that be made about it. IMHO, time to file an enhancement request on making the selection-object's behaviour consistent with past practice, and move onto more serious problems.

Regards,

has
--
http://www.barple.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk -- The Little Page of AppleScripts
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Better Open Dictionary
  • Next by Date: Re: Searching for the equivalent of coercing to type "record"
  • Previous by thread: Re: Selection (was Re: Better Open Dictionary)
  • Next by thread: Photoshop selections & missing variables
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread