• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)


  • Subject: Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
  • From: Michael Kelly <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:21 -0700
  • Mail-followup-to: AppleScript-Users <email@hidden>

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:25:44AM -0600, Doug McNutt wrote:
> At 20:31 -0700 5/7/03, Michael Kelly wrote:
> >Wow. I am both horrified and intrigued. Is there an actual reason for
> >this, or did some bored Apple tech just decide to change the order of
> >operations to mess with people's minds?
>
> I did file a bug report and it made it up the chain far enough to get
> a number. The problem is that some professor in some computer science
> department decided there was something called a "unary minus" operator
> which is not a subtraction. Back when algebra was taught in high
> school - remember that? - we learned that a leading minus sign implied
> a preceding zero.

This is interesting. It makes sense now that I think about it, but -2^2
= 4 is still completely unintuitive, and is just asking for problems.

Having to force it to be a subtraction operator, as Michelle mentioned,
by saying 0-2^2 (or just forcing the matter with parens), is ridiculous.

> The only other language I know that has it "wrong" is Microbesoft
> Excel where it's a unary minus if executed as a worksheet formula but
> an algebraically correct subtraction if executed as a Visual Basic
> macro. FORTRAN, BASIC, Gnumeric, AppleWorks, Maple, perl all have it
> "right". C doesn't have a power operator.

And all that's involved in fixing it is just moving the precedence of
the unary - down below that of the exponentiation operator, ^. I know
it's normally not good practice to do things like change operator
precedence between releases, but isn't this something screaming to be
fixed?

In table 3-1, on p. 87 of Programming Perl, one will notice that the
unary - has precedence right below that of ** (as you stated Perl has it
right). How reassuring.

Not trying to be combative or anything -- just trying to vent some of my
frustration about AppleScript. It never ends. Make the hurting stop...
--
Michael
email@hidden
http://www.jedimike.net
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
      • From: Michelle Steiner <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone? (From: Mark Butcher <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone? (From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>)
 >Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?) (From: Michael Kelly <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?) (From: Doug McNutt <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
  • Next by Date: Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
  • Next by thread: Re: Order of operations (was: Eigenvalues &/or eigenvectors, anyone?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread