Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
- Subject: Re: "idle" has different effect in X vs 9?
- From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:16:15 +0200
At 2:27 AM -0700 09/05/03, Christopher Nebel wrote:
>
I notice that Smile has the same usage profile as Script Editor; I don't have a copy of Script Debugger handy. I'm curious now; I'm not sure that it's possible to write a script runner that behaves really well for both normal script running and "delay" given the current architecture. It still doesn't change the answer for scripters, though.
If you had performed the test with Smile 2.4.3 you would probably have found totally different results. We had always been less "active-proc" than other script runners because our real-time applications built over Smile need CPU availability. For instance, a long "repeat" would not display the spin cursor in Smile.
We had to come to an usage more compliant to what SE does in order for AppleScript to be able to compile the xmlrpc-soap stuff.
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.