RE: Filemaker
RE: Filemaker
- Subject: RE: Filemaker
- From: "Ruby Madraswala" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:27:29 -0400
- Thread-topic: Filemaker
I agree, I am using Fox Pro, I like the user-defined functions and programming is very easy. Only downside it runs on PC only. AS we have a mix platform, I am thinking of alternative choices like Filemaker.
Ruby
-----Original Message-----
From: email@hidden [
mailto:email@hidden] On Behalf Of Walter Ian Kaye
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:20 AM
To: email@hidden
Subject: Re: Filemaker
I would prefer to see a ScriptMaker-ish text-based language, so FMP
developers could easily leverage their ScriptMaker knowledge. I want
it to support user-defined functions, a-la FoxPro's language (which
was based on dBASE III), and maybe even have those UDFs usable by
calc fields. As a text-based language, it could be copied easily from
one place to another. We would lose auto-updating of
db/table/field/list names, but we would gain so much more. It
wouldn't have to replace the existing ScriptMaker mechanism; it could
run side by side and even interact with the other language. Like
Excel's XLM-VBA interaction. Hmm, that might even allow some double
dereferencing so the text language could leverage the auto-updating
of the dialog-built language...
-boo
dreaming as usual
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.