Re: TechNote 2106
Re: TechNote 2106
- Subject: Re: TechNote 2106
- From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:13:37 -0800
At 04:39p +0100 03/04/2004, VRic didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:
4/03/04 Shane Stanley :
>My first thought was that floating ducks are just a subclass of real
>ducks. But if all real ducks float, and all ducks that float aren't
>necessary real -- back to the decoy duck -- then maybe it's the other
>way around. That's starting to sound pretty obscure, so it's probably
>correct.
Complex ducks, trigonometric notation.
imaginary axis
(many ducks)
^
|
|
| iDuck (imaginary duck, i: decoy part of iDuck)
| /
| |D|/ (absolute value of iDuck)
| /
| /\
| / Tetard (angle 0d -> real ducks axis)
|/ \
+ >
0 real ducks
(no duck)
Oh wait... if imaginary numbers are not the opposite of real numbers,
then how do imaginary ducks relate to real ducks? "i" don't know...
|-boo| -> abs value of .sig?
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.