Re: TechNote 2106
Re: TechNote 2106
- Subject: Re: TechNote 2106
- From: "John W. Baxter" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:34:54 -0800
On 3/3/2004 15:20, "Christopher Nebel" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
Of course, it's still a sort of lame example. A better name would be
>
"webbed feet", and even then it's sort of useless, because it's either
>
going to be "true" or "missing value" -- no real ducks have non-webbed
>
feet.
Duck-still-in-shell?
Is there a stage of development with recognizable feet and no webbing?
--John
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.