• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")


  • Subject: Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
  • From: Walter Ian Kaye <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:23:53 -0700

At 11:25a -0700 05/24/2004, Paul Berkowitz didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:

What's happened is that the dumb mail server is sending these messages a
second time, long after the issue got resolved. Ron is not reviving the
issue, but Mr. Tea won't know that. It's the damn server. It's a shame that
it should have picked these messages in particular to resend. (I've noticed
that sometimes this happens especially after a weekend. I don't know if
maybe it's connected with something that happens when a message has to be
approved by the list admin, sometimes because the sender has sent form a
non-subscribed address.

These are the headers which show the delay:

Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (fed1rmmtao12.cox.net [68.230.241.27]) by lists.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4OCpZCt017465 for <email@hidden>; Mon, 24 May 2004 05:51:40 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [68.3.160.3]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040521201254.OBEG26349.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@[192.168.1.101]>; Fri, 21 May 2004 16:12:54 -0400


-boo
wondering if in fact it was Cox which held up the message
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
      • From: Axel Luttgens <email@hidden>
    • Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
      • From: Dave Balderstone <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited") (From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
  • Next by Date: Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
  • Previous by thread: Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
  • Next by thread: Re: Unacceptable Rudeness (was "Unsafe Handlers Revisited")
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread