Re: Variable Ponderance
Re: Variable Ponderance
- Subject: Re: Variable Ponderance
- From: Emile Schwarz <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:10:17 +0200
Hi,
I do not get it too.
Isn't this an AppleScript list ?
and... if one want C, why did that one get C; there are plenty C all around us.
Oh, maybe the original poster wanted a baby-C ?
(No, I didn't say BBC !)
All the C advantages, no wooes ? ;)
Emile
email@hidden wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:25:57 -0400
From: email@hidden
Subject: Re: Variable Ponderance
To: email@hidden
Message-ID: <p06100503bd887aeec7c7@[192.168.1.133]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
At 9:03 PM +0100 10/4/04, has wrote:
Like I said in my original post, I'm not talking about
human-language dialects but programmer-oriented ones such as the
C-like dialect that was originally planned. A nice, simple, regular,
unambiguous syntax
C syntax? Regular? Simple? Unambiguous?
Obviously this is supposed to be some kind of joke, but I don't get it.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden