Re: Chevrons test
Re: Chevrons test
- Subject: Re: Chevrons test
- From: LuKreme <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:04:28 -0600
On 12 Sep 2004, at 14:08, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On Sep 12, 2004, at 9:40 AM, Martin Orpen wrote:
couple of his messages in the archives for the year 2033!
if the system clock on the machine that creates the mail is wrong, so
is the date in the archive.
I'm not sure I'd agree that it's a feature...
neither am I. we may change that. But there's always the philosophical
question of overriding what a user puts in their email, since it IS
their email. list servers DO make changes by definition, but at the
same time, you want to only change what you feel is necessary for the
common purposes. and besides, wouldn't it be better if these end users
FIXED THEIR SYSTEMS? (grin)
The Date stamp on the message the list sends should be the time on the
server that sends the mail. The date stamp of the original sender is
irrelevant. The date on your own server is the only number you can
really trust.
It doesn't matter to me since any message I receive with a time-stamp
more than 24 hours off gets the timestamp fixed to the time I received
the message.
But with the upcoming features of Tiger and local search, easy
download of archives becomes a key, and that also was a factor.
We await Jun 2005 with bated breath, and pray it will be sooner. :)
--
"I don't care how much melanin you have in your skin nor who you sleep
with, you can't have my cheese."
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden