• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs


  • Subject: Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
  • From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:45:31 -0800

On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Paul Berkowitz wrote:

[T]here's no way for the script developer on a PPC box to make his script application using a PPC osax such as 24U Appearance Osax workable on a MacTel.

Sure there is -- don't build Universal. Really. If you know you require a PPC-only library, then build your app PPC-only.

It was not clear to me, still on a PPC computer, that an applet made on that PPC computer would be PPC-only and would not have this problem.

It wasn't clear from your question whether you were referring to a simple applet saved out of Script Editor or an AppleScript Studio application. I thought you were talking about the latter, but really you meant the former, and the solutions differ.


In general, AppleScript just works on Intel hardware. The trick is that when you add third-party scripting additions into the mix, they become part of the equation -- you're not talking about just the stuff Apple ships any more. In order to run "native", the application *and all the libraries it uses* must be available "native". [1] For a script application, that means the AppleScript core (check), any host bits (for an applet, this is supplied for you, for Studio, you build this yourself), *and* any scripting additions it uses. Standard Additions is covered, but for obvious reasons, Apple can't guarantee that third-party additions are available natively.

So, if a scripting addition you want to use isn't available Universal, what do you do? If you're using Studio, just don't build your application Universal -- build PPC-only. For an applet, it's a bit hairier, because there are two different formats for applets, and they have different behaviors. Single-file applications ("Application" in the format menu) are always saved PPC-only, so no worries there. Application bundles as of 10.4.4 (no matter what kind of machine you're running) are saved Universal, and there's no option to not do that. You therefore have two options: one, tell your users to check the "Run in Rosetta" box if they're running on Intel hardware; or two, manually make the Universal binary PPC-only by using lipo(1). [2] (There's also option #3, which is to ask the addition author to produce a Universal version. You should probably do this in addition to #1 or #2.)

To answer your side question, the Get Info window (at least on an Intel Mac, I'm not sure about PPC) will tell you which architecture an application has been built for: the "Kind" will say either "Application (PowerPC)" or "Application (Universal)". The latter has an "Open using Rosetta" checkbox; the former does not since it would be pointless. (Your suggestion of a checked and disabled checkbox had occurred to me too, but I believe it's considered bad form to have a disabled control that there's no way for the user to enable.)


--Chris Nebel AppleScript and Automator Engineering

[1] That is, they've been compiled for the architecture they're running on. In practical terms, this means that something is PPC- only or Universal (both). It's technically possible to build something Intel-only, but there are very few sane reasons to do that.

[2] The name "lipo" makes more sense if you know that "Universal" binaries used to be referred to as "fat".
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
      • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
    • Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
      • From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
    • Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
      • From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs (From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
  • Next by Date: Re: Filemaker & Searching for File in Finder
  • Previous by thread: Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
  • Next by thread: Re: Osaxen and Intel MBP's or iMacs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread