Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:04:39 -0600
- Thread-topic: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
On 3/7/06 17:45, "Bill Briggs" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Microsoft Word (version 2004)
>
> I don't use Word, nor am I about to start. Not something I would care about.
> If you tell me I would find it lame, then I'll believe you until I get in a
> situation where I have to script it.
Word's scriptability is less lame and more very, very, odd, but that's a
situation imposed by having to server two masters. It's gotten better, as
v.X's was really quite unusable.
--
Q: Were you present when your picture was taken?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden