Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame?
- From: Emile Schwarz <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:16:56 +0100
email@hidden wrote:
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:48:22 +0100 From: jj <email@hidden> Subject: Re: TextEdit, is it really that lame? To: applescriptmaillist <email@hidden> Message-ID: <C0349F36.B2F5%email@hidden> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
dogfood ? You meant catfood :)
No offense intended for dogs, but I prefer myself catfood to dogfood...
What if we call it "turtlefood" instead? (no offense intended neither for
turtles)
Sorry, it was a reference to Tiger, Panther, Cheetah, whatever previous or next
OS code name...
It was intended as a joke :)
Cheers,
Emile
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden