• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)


  • Subject: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • From: Adam Bell <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:11:14 -0300

Title: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
At 5:55 PM -0700 5/22/06, Stockly, Ed wrote:
>>> If there's a proclamation that it's not appropriate for this list, or if a specific poster says it's not what they want I'll accept that, but having this debate with third-parties each time it comes up seems counterproductive.


OK, I think I complain about this more than anyone else because I'm concerned that this list is becoming more and more a list for shell scripters than  for AppleScripters and that makes this list less and less hospitable to AppleScripters, especially new AppleScripters.
This list was started because the MacScripter's list became more of a Frontier list than anything else and you couldn't ask a simple AppleScript question without getting a flood of Usertalk solutions that would drown out the AppleScript answers the user was looking for. 

I'm concerned with Ed's statement I've bolded above. As a Principal of MacScripter.net (I administer ScriptBuilders.net and edit the MacScripter.net cover articles that now appear every Monday), but a relative newbie to AppleScripting (started in February 2005), I certainly don't perceive http://bbs.applescript.net/ as being newbie or "pure" AppleScript unfriendly. In fact, I find this list less friendly and more inclined to the gist of Ed's complaint than MacScripter is.

Nor do I object to shell script solutions when they are more efficient (and reasonably comprehensible) than a "pure" AppleScript solution. I know of no other easy way, for example, to discover some system settings than by using "defaults read", and "mkdir" is a much faster way to create a pre-defined folder hierarchy than scripting the Finder will ever be. I can think of others, but to me, even though I haven't the vaguest understanding of "sed" or "awk", for examples, cURL is extremely useful, and other unix tools are much faster than scripting the System Profiler for setup information.

my 2 cents.

Adam
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
      • From: "Gary (Lists)" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux) (From: "Stockly, Ed" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Next by Date: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Previous by thread: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Next by thread: Re: To shell or not to shell (was Re: URL Access Redux)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread