Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
- Subject: Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
- From: "Mark J. Reed" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:08:54 -0400
Well, a monotonic byte order makes the most sense on byte-addressible machines.
If address X contains 64-bit word 0x0123456789abcdef, then that same
location should either reference all of 0x01234567, 0x0123, and 0x01,
or else 0x89abcdef, 0xcdef, and 0xef.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden