• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!


  • Subject: Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
  • From: "Mark J. Reed" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:08:54 -0400

Well, a monotonic byte order makes the most sense on byte-addressible machines.

If address X contains 64-bit word 0x0123456789abcdef, then that same
location should either reference all of  0x01234567, 0x0123, and 0x01,
or else 0x89abcdef, 0xcdef, and 0xef.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards! (From: has <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards! (From: Harald E Brandt <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
  • Next by Date: RE: Choose File
  • Previous by thread: Re: Intel writes creator codes backwards!
  • Next by thread: re: Reported Size issue in PSCS2 (Oakley Masten)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread