Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
- Subject: Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:25:58 -0500
- Thread-topic: Irritating list reply-to policy
On 1/1/07 18:18, "Randal L. Schwartz" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> That was my *intent*. I *wanted* to reply *only to you* because this subject
> has been beaten to death.
Here's the part where M. Schwartz is about to learn the difference between
"what I want" and "what's going to happen".
>
> And thanks to the POLICIES OF THIS LIST, I was able to do that EASILY.
<pirates>
See, it's really more of a *guideline* than a rule
</pirates>
>
> And now you've gone and violated MY COPYRIGHT by broadcasting that message.
Oh dear, see, now we confuse what we want for rule of law. Sorry, but survey
SAYS: The copyright fairy laughs at you and does rude things in your
Cheerios. Mayhaps you should stop confusing your wants with the way things
are.
>
> You could a whack of a LART right about now.
It would appear the clue-by-four you've been hit with is getting in the way,
and that's not what a LRT is for anyway.
--
You should never put a string of lit Black Cat firecrackers in someone¹s
back pocket while they¹re on stage playing bass guitar with their band. Even
if they fucked your knee up by reversing the figure-four on you that one
time. And even if you crack up at just the idea of someone with their pants
are on fire jumping up and down and spinning around and around like a dog
chasing its tail while trying to figure out what¹s going on. Yup, someone
could get their ass burned, so it¹s wrong. Despite the fact that it's
really, really funny.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/mailman//archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden