Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
- Subject: Re: Irritating list reply-to policy
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:44:55 -0500
- Thread-topic: Irritating list reply-to policy
On 1/1/07 23:05, "Randal L. Schwartz" <email@hidden> wrote:
> I tried to do the right thing. I tried to inform $pseudonymous person
> that reply-to is harmful. I did it with a private email.
No, you did it via a way you assumed was private. In reality, that was her
choice as the recpient.
>
> The fact that it was brought back PUBLICLY was laughable.
Not nearly as much as your reaction.
>
> So, let's not be mistaking what actually happened here.
You didn't get your way and had a temper tantrum. Yep, that seems to work
for me.
>
> Those of us that have been around the block a few times were trying
> to educate those of us who didn't seem to have the clues yet.
Pfft...look in de mirror sonny before you apply dat dere clooless label to
others.
>
> And the response on his (her?) part was comedy gold. Sheesh.
It would have to be PLATINUM plated to rival your accusation of COPYRIGHT
VIOLATION in an EMAIL.
you SO have no moral high ground here. Better holster that pointin' finger.
--
No matter how long the river, the river will reach the sea.
-Eugene Fitch Ware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/mailman//archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden