Re: Leopard Date Bugs
Re: Leopard Date Bugs
- Subject: Re: Leopard Date Bugs
- From: Claus Gerhardt <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:01:47 +0100
In 10.5.1 I get the correct result using a custom date format
date "January 1, 2000 0:00:00"
Claus
On Nov 16, 2007, at 21:46, Michelle Steiner wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Stockly, Ed wrote:
It happens with any date from Jan 1, 1000 to Dec 31, 1099. The
"date
string" function returns a date six days earlier than the expected
date, but with the day of the week for the original date.
Hmmm, this may not be confined to AppleScript and may not be
confined to
those date ranges.
Well, it doesn't happen in the year 999 or the year 1100. I tried a
few other dates at random, and got the right answers.
I just got a hard copy proof from an Excel document that had date
fields off
by six days, while the day of week was correct.
Interesting. What was the formula? I'll see whether I can
reproduce it in Numbers.
-- Michelle
--
I can't say I've never been wrong. Well, I can say it, but I'd be
wrong.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (applescript-
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden