• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)


  • Subject: Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
  • From: Paul Scott <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:05:58 -0800


On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Jon Pugh wrote:
I'm with Chris on this one. AppleScript is not loose at all. It's an incredibly simple language.

It's simple only on the surface. Does anyone really expect a neophyte to understand its intricacies? Especially since the documentation only scratches the surface? And the problems aren't just with the language per se. Are we really expected to depend entirely on the dictionaries without any supporting documentation? Just one example (of a myriad), what does iTunes do with "make" from the standard suite? What doesn't it do? ... I feel abandoned.


On Dec 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Jon Pugh wrote:
Script Debugger provides [script libraries] for over 10 years.


Not from Apple. Yes, it matters to me. No, I won't indulge that argument.

Paul



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
      • From: Chris Page <email@hidden>
    • Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
      • From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
    • Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
      • From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful) (From: has <email@hidden>)
 >Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful) (From: Chris Page <email@hidden>)
 >Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful) (From: Paul Scott <email@hidden>)
 >Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful) (From: Chris Page <email@hidden>)
 >Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful) (From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
  • Next by Date: Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
  • Previous by thread: Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
  • Next by thread: Re: on neophytes vs perfectionists (was Re: Tell Blocks Considered Harmful)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread