Re: Telling remote Finder to sleep
Re: Telling remote Finder to sleep
- Subject: Re: Telling remote Finder to sleep
- From: Deivy Petrescu <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:44:13 -0400
On 25/06/2009, at 11:36 , Steve Mills wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 10:23:45, Matt Neuburg wrote:
in general I find that IP numbers work better (and I assign my local
machines fixed IP numbers, in part for this very reason).
Using the IP address instead worked. Thanks.
Of couse, as I've
also said, if all you want to do is tell a remote machine to sleep,
there
are much better ways than using eppc. m.
Please say it again. My mind-reading port has been blocked by my ISP.
Steve Mills
Drummer, Mac geek
http://sjmills5.home.mchsi.com/
Actually, using the Finder and the bonjour name of the Mac works fine
here.
System Events does not!
Interesting, because few OS's ago (I really can't remember which OS!),
System Events was the way to go for remote scripting.
Now it will not work.
It complains that the app is not running.
May be this was brought upon us by security reasons.
Both Chris's can elaborate on that
Deivy Petrescu
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden