Re: date/Snow Leopard changed
Re: date/Snow Leopard changed
- Subject: Re: date/Snow Leopard changed
- From: Yvan KOENIG <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:41:05 +0200
Le 6 sept. 2009 à 13:27:27, Mark J. Reed a écrit : Yvan: "A new kind of Apartheid"? Nice. Ya know who else used insulting hyperbole to make a point? HITLER!
It does appear that we lost some functionality as far as converting strings to dates, though. Hopefully that was an unintentional side effect of the new implementation? But does the fact that it's documented behavior mean that Apple doesn't consider it a defect?
Can you construct an arbitrary date in one step without parsing a string? "make new date with properties {year: y, month: m, day: d}" maybe?
From my point of view it's "apartheid" because the app treats differently English users and non English ones.
If you prefer, I may use the word "segregation" !
I can't assume that it's not an intentional behavior because I clearly asked upon this problem in: Objet : Rép: date/Snow Leopard changed Date : 3 septembre 2009 11:36:45 HAEC
and in
Objet : Rép : date/Snow Leopard changed Date : 3 septembre 2009 14:50:09 HAEC
and got no reaction.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 6 septembre 2009 13:40:38
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden