Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: evalhate without parsing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: evalhate without parsing?

Subject: Re: evalhate without parsing?
From: Christopher Stone <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:12:53 -0500

On May 07, 2013, at 13:21, Christopher Nebel <email@hidden> wrote:
> To be more explicit, see "numeric strings" under that URL:
> ...
> If the surrounding content is the same for both strings, that comparison option is all you need.
______________________________________________________________________

Thanks Chris,

Good to know.

If I'd known it in the past I've forgotten.

--
Best Regards,
Chris
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>evalhate without parsing? (From: Robert Poland <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Christopher Stone <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Christopher Stone <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Robert Poland <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Christopher Stone <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Robert Poland <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Christopher Stone <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Philip Ershler <email@hidden>)
	>Re: evalhate without parsing? (From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: uneditable [OT]
Next by Date: Re: uneditable [OT]
Previous by thread: Re: evalhate without parsing?
Next by thread: Re: evalhate without parsing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread