Re: Finder "duplicate" requirements
Re: Finder "duplicate" requirements
- Subject: Re: Finder "duplicate" requirements
- From: Deivy Petrescu <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:48:45 -0400
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 21:05 , Shane Stanley <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 10:57 am, Deivy Petrescu <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> However, I do believe that certain SA commands should continue to fail silently.
>> "display dialog" and “say' for instance.
>
> They're not failing silently; they're *succeeding* because they have the right security context.
>
> --
> Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
Shane you are right and wrong, and I just fail myself in my Discrete Math class…. :-}
When I wrote it, I meant the commands that display an error in the log window, but auto-fixes it, if you will and merrily goes on.
In JSA, the case is very similar to ASOBj-C, if you don’t explicitly call the usage of scripting additions it will err badly, with no regards to security context.
So, I believe that, while the explanation in their explanation in the release notes might be fine for AS, it should explicitly say that this is not the case for ASOBj-C (I believe this one is there, I remember reading about it) and JSA.
I’ve seen in forums people complaining about such error, when converting their AS to JSA.
But, not to fail myself, I do accept that the commands are indeed succeeding.
Deivy
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden