Re: Indeed
Re: Indeed
- Subject: Re: Indeed
- From: "S. J. Cunningham" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:12:31 -0500
On Jan 12, 2017, at 1:46 AM, Shane Stanley wrote:
> <https://www.macstories.net/stories/app-extensions-are-not-a-replacement-for-user-automation/>
Adam Engst of Tidbits is gathering automation success stories for a letter writing campaign to Apple:
> If Apple’s seeming indifference toward automation worries you
> because you rely on scripts, macros, workflows, and more to get your
> work done quickly, effectively, and accurately, here’s what I’d like
> you to do. Leave a comment on this article outlining how you depend
> on Mac automation tools in your job. If there are too many examples
> to fit in a single comment, just focus on those that are the most
> important to you. I’ll compile all the comments and publish them as
> a future article, and I’ll also send a copy to Craig Federighi and
> Apple CEO Tim Cook so they see concrete examples of why we need
> these automation technologies to continue to evolve
I don't think it will have much effect but I contributed anyway. Here's the link:
http://tidbits.com/e/16982#comments
Steve
------------------
OS X 10.6.8, AppleScript 2.1.2
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
AppleScript-Users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Archives: http://lists.apple.com/archives/applescript-users
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >Indeed (From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>) |