Re: Docs
Re: Docs
- Subject: Re: Docs
- From: Phillip Mills <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:15:48 -0400
On 8/23/01 12:16 PM, "Jonathan Hendry" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
Just curious, did you download the source code from the OReilly website
>
and try compiling it?
No, I wanted to do it from the book.
>
Also, did you check the website for errata
>
listings
>
and corrections?
Yes, eventually; I didn't start out expecting the volume or pervasiveness of
the errors. My point, however, is that a great number of them should never
have made it that far. *Any* amount of attempted validation using a
compiler could not have avoided finding them.
>
IMHO, O'Reilly bends over backwards compared to most publishers.
I agree, which is a good part of the reason that I *have* bought (and been
happy with) so many of their other titles.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Docs
- From: Chris Gehlker <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >Re: Docs (From: Jonathan Hendry <email@hidden>) |