• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Re(2): ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re(2): ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)


  • Subject: Re: Re(2): ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:02:06 -0800

On Thursday, December 20, 2001, at 06:35 AM, Jens Bauer wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> {snip}
>
>>>> Most of these apps will NEVER be ported to Cocoa, and for all of its
>>>> glories, there are no Cocoa apps in the same league of importance to
>>>> Apple
>>>> as the above list. If push came to shove, which Framework do
>>>> you think
>>>> they'd drop?
>>>>
>>>> Matt Gough
>
> Even though your list is long, I definately think they would
> drop Carbon.

Apple's not going to drop Carbon any time in the foreseeable future.

-jcr

"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -
Popular Mechanics, 1949


References: 
 >Re(2): ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-) (From: Jens Bauer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: resizing images in NSTextView
  • Next by Date: Re: CriticalAlert
  • Previous by thread: Re(2): ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • Next by thread: Re: ObjC++ (and a word about Java, too ;-)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread