• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Missing Something] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Missing Something] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!


  • Subject: Re: [Missing Something] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:42:21 +0100

On Thursday, July 5, 2001, at 06:30 pm, Rosyna wrote:

Did we all forget the Mac OS has never allowed multiple instances of an application? Windows always has and it was probably easy to build on top of this "functionality"

cocoa CAN run multiple instances of a single app using different users. but imagine if a user was running First Class or Fizzila and fast-switched. It would make it impossible for another user to use these apps.

or the same user, in fact. just run the binary directly.

-- Finlay


References: 
 >[Missing Something] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X! (From: Rosyna <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: [OT] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!
  • Next by Date: Re: Project Builder & CVS
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Missing Something] Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!
  • Next by thread: Re: Let's hope XP doesn't keep this "one-up" on OS X!
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread