Re: Obj-C vs Java- how about ObjC vs C++
Re: Obj-C vs Java- how about ObjC vs C++
- Subject: Re: Obj-C vs Java- how about ObjC vs C++
- From: Vladimir Makovsky <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:20:31 -0400
>
At this time C++ development with Cocoa is extremely limited. Once
>
ObjC++ makes it back in to a build, it will be far more relevant to
>
this discussion. At this time however, C++ has very little
>
relevance to Cocoa developers in general.
and that's what bothers me most...
Does Carbon give performance impact vs. Cocoa (because it's one more layer)
or not really?
thx,
Vlad
>
From: Eric Peyton <email@hidden>
>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:04:21 -0500
>
To: Vladimir Makovsky <email@hidden>
>
Cc: <email@hidden>
>
Subject: Re: Obj-C vs Java- how about ObjC vs C++
>
>
On Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 08:50 AM, Vladimir Makovsky wrote:
>
>
> I keep wondering why C++ is not associated any more with MacOS
>
> development?
>
> (all of a sudden...)
>
>
Since I would say a very high percentage of CARBON development is
>
done using C++, my guess is that there will be more shipping apps
>
using C++ on Carbon than any other language (at least for a while
>
once the ports start really rolling in)./
>
>
>
>
> Seemed like *some* people have succeeded writing tons of desktop
>
> applications using it.
>
>
>
>
Yes, that is true.
>
>
> What is gonna happen to existing apps written in C++ for classic?
>
> Should be
>
> ported to Obj-C?
>
>
>
>
No - they should in most likelihood be ported to carbon. But since
>
this is a cocoa development list, and not a carbon one, the 2
>
languages supported in cocoa (Java and ObjC) will be the ones most
>
talked about on this list.
>
>
At this time C++ development with Cocoa is extremely limited. Once
>
ObjC++ makes it back in to a build, it will be far more relevant to
>
this discussion. At this time however, C++ has very little
>
relevance to Cocoa developers in general.
>
>
>
>
> Are there Obj-C compilers for other platforms?
>
>
>
>
Yes.
>
>
Eric
>
>
>
>
> thx,
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
>>
>
>> They've spent too much time with the 'write once, run anywhere'
>
>> mantra for that to be the case.
>
>>
>
>> I realize that it does have it's place in the appliance area..
>
>>
>
>> but there is no question that they attempted, and failed, at the
>
>> desktop.. their own purchase, and failure of conversion of the
>
>> lighthouse suite is a prime example of this (as is their devman
>
>> purchase, and others)
>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>> cocoa-dev mailing list
>
>> email@hidden
>
>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cocoa-dev mailing list
>
> email@hidden
>
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
>
cocoa-dev mailing list
>
email@hidden
>
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev